Essex HUGH, John & Samuel Vermont Historical Magazine, No. XI, October 1867, pp 1032-1035 (extracted from a section on the history of Maidstone, Essex County, Vermont) Among the earliest settlers of Maidstone [Essex County, Vermont] was John HUGH, who was born in 1737 in Musselborough, Scotland. He was only eight years of age when the celebrated battle of Preston Pans was fought in the same town, and well remembered his father's returning home after the battle was over. While in the company of four other boys of his own age along the banks of the Frith of Forth enjoying a holiday at the age of sixteen, he [John HUGH] with the others were enticed to go on board a small vessel lying not far distant. After they were on board they soon learned that they were captives to a press gang then in the employ of and sanctioned by the British government. They were soon placed on board of a man of war, and neither ever saw their home, kindred, or country again. At this period the English were at war with the French, and the vessel was bound for the Colonies in America. After a stormy passage they made the port of Boston. By an understanding between the boys they affected to be well pleased with their new life and duties. They were furnished with soldiers' clothes and rations. After remaining on board for a sufficient time to quiet suspicion, one night when the sentinel was drowsy, they let themselves down the vessel's side by ropes and made their escape by swimming to the shore. Being entirely ignorant of the country and its inhabitants, they traveled by night through the new sparsely settled region and lay still during the day. But at length, pressed for food, they called at a farmer's house by the name of HARRIMAN, in Plaistow [County], New Hampshire. Here they were received with kindness, and acting under advice, they all changed their clothing and separated in order to evade being recaptured. The subject of this narrative [John HUGH], from this time to the commencement of the Revolutionary War, made his home with his benefactor, and subsequently married Anna HARRIMAN, his daughter. He was in he War of the Revolution, and fought at the battles of Bunker Hill, Bennington, and Ticonderoga. From Plaistow he removed to Haverhill [County], New Hampshire, where he purchased a farm, and was the seventh family in that town. From here he removed to Newbury [County], Vermont, and bought a farm on the great Ox Bow. This place he sold subsequently, and took the whole pay in Continental money, which proved to be entirely worthless. From here he moved to Derryfield, now Manchester [County], New Hampshire, and from there afterward to Maidstone [County], Vermont, in March 1781. He purchased the place on which he lived and died, of Mr. LINSEY the year before, the same being now owned by D. H. and T. G. BEATTIE. At the time Mr. [John] HUGH moved to Maidstone the whole country was almost an unbroken wilderness. There were no roads of any kind, and the settlers had to make the tedious circuit of the river on the ice. The snow was very deep, and the weather intensely cold. The family suffered extreme hardships in getting through. After a clearing was made sufficiently large a small log house was built, then came he scarcity of provisions, the terror of Indians, and all the other privations, fears and hardships incident to the settlement of a new country in those days. By the time some of the sons had grown up, and owing to their skill with the gun, and their experience in border life, they gave great offense to the Indians. The settlers never went into the woods to hunt for cattle, nor into the fields to work, but what they had firearms always at hand. In addition to the hatred the Indians bore to John HUGH and sons, they had a pecuniary motive in taking them prisoners, dead or alive, for a bounty was paid the Indians by the British government for all prisoners taken alive into Canada, and $5 for each scalp. About this time a party of British Indians came in from Canada by way of the Connecticut River. They took several prisoners as they came along, and amongst them was James LUTHER. With a view of securing John HUGH and some of his sons, the party encamped just back of Mr. BEATTIE's orchard in the woods at that time, intending to make the attack the next morning at the break of day. As it happened by accident that morning Mr. [John] HUGH and his eldest son, John, got up very early intending to go over a line of sable traps which they had set, running directly west from the river some five miles. Thinking that their guns might want cleaning, they washed them out, and in order to dry them put in a charge of powder and fired them off. At this the Indians took alarm, supposing they were discovered and that a large force had collected to give them battle. Owing to this slight circumstance the HUGHs saved themselves from captivity, and perhaps their lives. Anna HUGH was a noble woman, and bore the heat and burden of those early days of toil and self-denial with a true woman's fortitude. As an evidence of her kind heart, it is related that shortly after they came into the settlement, three captive men who had escaped from the Indians somewhere in Canada, and made their way alone and without food back and struck Connecticut River on John HUGH's farm. They were almost famished, having lived several days without food except the twigs and bark of trees. Mrs. HUGH immediately made a soup, and for hours fed them with a spoon in order to allay their hunger without periling their lives by a hearty meal. Two of these men were very large, and the other a small one. It was often said afterwards by the small man that, on the last day, the looks of his two large companions told him that unless they had food soon he would be the one first to be killed, in order to preserve the others. John HUGH was a plain, sober, industrious man, and died respected by his friends and neighbors, 27 September 1814. His wife [Anna HUGH] died the year before, and both lie side by side in the little buying ground in the town [Maidstone, Essex County, Vermont]. It might perhaps be proper to add that he raised a large family of sons and daughters, namely John, Jesse, James, Joah, Samuel, Anna, Sally, and Dorcas, and most of them lived to an advanced age, all having passed away except Dorcas. The three last named sons, from 1810 to 1817, moved to the Genesee valley, New York. Here they and their descendants went into the forest, as their father did before them, and helped change it into one of the finest wheat growing sections in the world. Not long afterwards they engaged with others in the great enterprise of the day which, when completed, have made New York in truth the Empire State. These enterprises were her canals and turnpikes, and later her steamboats and railroads. Like many other Westerners, without any reason therefor, the name of "HUGHES" was substituted for "HUGH," the true family Scotch name. Many of the descendants of these sons and daughters have moved still farther west and are now found in many of the northwestern states. Two of the sons of Joah, John M. HUGH, Esq., and Hon. Arthur HUGH, are among the most prominent public men of Cleveland [Cuyahoga County], Ohio. But the oldest son, John, adhering to the associations and local attachments of his boyhood, never left the woods and ranges where he had enjoyed the sports of hunting. Few men were more fond of a moose or deer hunt than he, and none ever enjoyed more the pleasures of camp life. The woods of the northern portions of Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine, were all familiar to him, as the pastures, fields and meadow lands are to he thrifty farmer. His mind was well stored with hunting lore, Indian traditions and revolutionary incidents. The following was one of those early reminiscences. When a small boy, his father was a near neighbor of Gen. STARK. The General being absent in the war and help scarce, by permission of his father he went and worked for Mrs. STARK in the hayfield in company with herself, a son of about the same age as himself, the girls and two hired men. A few days before the battle of Bennington, while thus engaged a courier arrived in great haste and delivered to Mrs. STARK a letter from her husband, and with the rake leaning on her shoulder she read it aloud, which was to the following effect: "Dear Molly, In less than one week the British forces here will be ours. Send every man from the farm that will come, and let the haying go to hell." This was characteristic of the General. Few men had such a general store of knowledge as John HUGH the younger. It was called from every source of knowledge. His memory was remarkable, and often people would come from a distance to gather from his great storehouse of information facts and incidents in connection with the early settlement of the country. He lived in the town of Canaan and died there at an advanced age some ten years since. Samuel HUGH, the youngest son of John HUGH, lived at a time when there was occasionally school of a few weeks in the winter season. This however was limited by a few of what are now called elementary studies, such as spelling, reading, and writing, with the ground rules of arithmetic, geography in those days being rather too classical. Previous to the War of 1812 he was appointed Deputy Collector of the State of Vermont, and continued so until he was forcibly taken from his own home in Canaan by a band of ruffians from Canada and carried a prisoner out of the United States. The circumstances connected with this outrage was as follows: There were parties from Canada engaged in smuggling through property, chiefly cattle, from the States, and it is to be regretted that many of our citizens were then as now found who were anxious to give "aid and comfort to the enemy." It was a duty of the officers of customs to put a stop to this contraband business, and they did so, but not without the loss of several lives. Hearing that a large drove of cattle was being started through by the smugglers, Samuel HUGH gathered together a number of men and pursued them. Among the number were Ephraim MAHURIN, Eleazer SLOCUM, William McALLISTER, and --- COGSWELL, and several others, all armed. The party did not succeed in overtaking the drove of cattle until they got over the line and had been delivered to the purchasers, who were also in force expecting a conflict. Samuel HUGH was a powerful man, over six feet in high and weighed over 200 pounds. Two men by the name of MORRILL also powerful men attached him at once, and having knocked one of them down, the other was in the very act of snapping a loaded gun at HUGH's breast before he could use his own weapon again, when someone from the American party more expert fired his rifle and MORRILL fell dead. As several guns were discharged at the same time, it was never known to whom HUGH was indebted for his life. In the melee another of the Canadian party was wounded. His name was also MORRILL and a brother of the one who was killed. There was also a third man by the same name, and was a nephew of the others. It was he who made the attack on HUGH as before mentioned. He had previously discharged his gun at him loaded with ball and buckshot. The charge passed through Mr. HUGH's clothing, but did no injury to his person. But about four weeks after the affair, in the dead of night, Samuel HUGH's house was surrounded by an armed party from Canada, together with their friends and sympathizers in the States, amounting to nearly 100 persons. He had just moved into a new house. The first intimation of their presence was the breaking in of almost every window. The family, consisting of Mrs. HUGH and a number of small children, were thrown into great alarm and distress, and clung around their natural protector. Seeing guns leveled at him from every direction, one of which was snapped at him but missed fire, he managed to free his person from his wife and children to prevent their being shot, for he had no doubt they came to murder him. This was unquestionably the object of some of them, but they were prevented by the more considerate and less guilty portion of the party. Immediately all he sock and whatever property they could lay their hands on was taken and hurried off. Mr. HUGH himself was placed on a horse with his feet tied under the horse, and armed men walked on each side to guard him. This was in extreme cold weather in November 1814. The news spread like wildfire, and soon as a large party could be collected, which was not until the next day at noon, to rescue Mr. HUGH, they started in full pursuit. But before they got through the woods they found that they were too far behind to overtake he enemy, and returned. Mr. [Samuel] HUGH was first taken to Stanstead. Here he sent across the line to David HOPKINSON his brother-in-law who then resided in Derby. On Mr. HOPKINSON's appearance he was arrested himself on some pretext and kept closely guarded by keepers three days, and could render no assistance. From Stanstead Mr. HUGH was carried to Montreal, thrown into prison and heavily loaded with irons. Here Morrill MAGOON, afterward notorious for his counterfeiting and other crimes for which he was executed, was his keeper. During his stay here, MAGOON intimated to him that for a certain sum he would secure his escape. This sum was subsequently raised and sent on, but before it came it was decided that Mr. HUGH could not be tried at Montreal, but that he must be send to Three Rivers. At the last named place he was tried, and on their failing to prove the homicide he was convicted by the Court of some minor offence and sentenced to be branded and imprisoned for three months. This conviction was to show the petty spleen the courts of Great Britain had against our government. Again Mr. HUGH was loaded with chains and confined in a dark, loathsome cell. His sufferings from vermin and filth, with fare that Christians would have hardly offered their lowest brutes, soon reduced Mr. HUGH to a mere skeleton compared with what he was before entering a British prison. In addition to this, all manner of abuse and indignities were heaped upon him. Soon after peace was declared his friends got up petitions which were forwarded to the Governor of Vermont, and he procured what official papers were necessary and authorized Seth CUSHMAN of Guildhall to go to Canada and present them to the Governor General of that province. This had the effect to set Mr. HUGH at liberty, who returned to his family, having been imprisoned upwards of one year. The legislature of Vermont granted to his [Samuel HUGH's] wife, Patty HUGH, $1,000. Such are some of the stirring events that characterized the lives of the patriots on the frontiers, who periled their lives and their property in behalf of the liberty of their country. Samuel HUGH died about eight years ago, as he had lived, an honored and patriotic man, respected and remembered by all who knew him. More about John HUGH Vermont Historical Magazine, No. XI, October 1867, p 1015 (extracted from a section on the history of Lemington, Essex County, Vermont) John HUGH came to this town [Lemington, Essex County, Vermont] in 1786 from Maidstone [Essex County, Vermont]. He lived in Lemington several years, and then moved to Canaan [Essex County, Vermont], where he remained until his death. His brother, Samuel HUGH, came to this town [Lemington] in 1800. In 1814 Samuel HUGH, in company with several other, went in pursuit of some men who were driving cattle from Vermont to the British. HUGH's party overtook the men just as they reached the boundary line between Vermont and Canada, and ordered them to desist and let the cattle go back, which they refused to do, whereupon some of HUGH's party fired on them and killed a man by the name of MORRILL and wounded one or two others. The rest of them retreated and HUGH's party drove the cattle back. About two months after the events above narrated occurred, a party of Canadians (among them the brother of the man that was shot) came out secretly from Canada and surrounded the dwelling house of [Samuel] HUGH about midnight. At a given signal the windows of the house were broken in, and the party rushed into the house and made [Samuel] HUGH a prisoner, and carried him to Canada, where he was confined about a year, when he was tried for murder and acquitted on the ground that MORRILL was engaged in unlawful business. - 1862 Submitted by Cathy Kubly